I don't know what you are talking about, but if it involves mind reading, I will do it for beer alone.
Jerry, clearly you are not as informed as Will. I'm astonished that fear of embarrassment didn't stop you from admitting you have no knowledge of this widely disseminated story. Shame on you. I advise you to prepare for some serious, and completely deserved, derision coming from Will shortly.Also, kudos to Will for being aware of this outrage and sharing his invaluable opinion on it with the world. We should all be grateful... and lobby our elected officials for Will to get the job. Surely he is a superb mind reader.No doubt he knows what both of us are thinking this very minute.
You don't need to be a mind-reader to discern that you have issues, wd. This was a light-hearted joke of a post and you turn it into some vendetta. Happy Easter.
Gee, I guess I really missed it. I thought Will's post was a joke as well as my and w-d's comments. Maybe Easter is too serious of a time to joke.
Of course I was joking. This is another post from Will where he's the only one who knows what he's talking about. I have no choice but to conclude that Will's mind reading abilities are non-existent. He should not be hired for the job even for the cost of the beer.
I agree. I would not even pay him one beer for his mind reading services.
Nobody can mind-read, and that's why this is such an utter waste of tax-payer money. The way that I see it, a spate of people should be fired over this.
It appears as though you deleted your post about the "arrogant" Obama's statement regarding the Affordable Care Act. After submitting my response to "Rational" I got an error from Blogger indicating that the action could not be completed. What gives?
I didn't delete the post. I put back in my draft folder to finish (I accidentally posted it, I gather).
It's a conspiracy, I tell ya. The 1% have conspired to make it difficult for WD to comment here.Error from Blogger? Yeah right. There's really a Koch brother working in the Google offices examining comments and clicking buttons to achieve this effect.
Will is in the 1 percent? I guess that explains a lot.
You talk about the 1% as if it's a fixed segment of the population. You do know, don't you, that the composition of the top 1% in year A isn't the same as it is in year A+5, A+10, etc.?
Post a Comment